Section 2.6 : Infinite Limits
2. For h(t)=2t6+t evaluate,
- limt→−6−h(t)
- limt→−6+h(t)
- limt→−6h(t)
Show All Solutions Hide All Solutions
a limt→−6−h(t) Show SolutionLet’s start off by acknowledging that for t→−6− we know t<−6.
For the numerator we can see that, in the limit, we will get -12.
The denominator takes a little more work. Clearly, in the limit, we have,
6+t→0but we can actually go a little farther. Because we know that t<−6 we also know that,
6+t<0More compactly, we can say that in the limit we will have,
6+t→0−So, in the limit, the numerator is approaching a negative number and the denominator is an increasingly small negative number. The quotient must then be an increasing large positive number or,
limt→−6−2t6+t=∞Note that this also means that there is a vertical asymptote at t=−6.
b limt→−6+h(t) Show Solution
Let’s start off by acknowledging that for t→−6+ we know t>−6.
For the numerator we can see that, in the limit, we will get -12.
The denominator will also work similarly to the first part. In the limit, we have,
6+t→0but we can actually go a little farther. Because we know that t>−6 we also know that,
6+t>0More compactly, we can say that in the limit we will have,
6+t→0+So, in the limit, the numerator is approaching a negative number and the denominator is an increasingly small positive number. The quotient must then be an increasing large negative number or,
limt→−6+2t6+t=−∞Note that this also means that there is a vertical asymptote at t=−6, which we already knew from the first part.
c limt→−6h(t) Show Solution
In this case we can see from the first two parts that,
limt→−6−h(t)≠limt→−6+h(t)and so, from our basic limit properties we can see that limt→−6h(t) does not exist.
For the sake of completeness and to verify the answers for this problem here is a quick sketch of the function.
